Lecture 11- What is
Critical Analysis?
Lecture Aims
-To explore the meaning of critical
analysis
-To develop critical thinking and writing skills
-To begin critically analysing some examples
-To develop critical thinking and writing skills
-To begin critically analysing some examples
Definitions
-critical analysis - an appraisal based on careful analytical
evaluation
-Critical analysis is a central process involved in all academic work. It involves hard (critical) thinking which is applying rational and logical thinking while deconstructing the different texts that a person reads
-it is when you are a terrorist
-Critical analysis is a central process involved in all academic work. It involves hard (critical) thinking which is applying rational and logical thinking while deconstructing the different texts that a person reads
-it is when you are a terrorist
How does
it work?
-Carefully considering an idea and weighing up the
evidence supporting it to see if it is convincing
-Then being able to explain why you find the evidence convincing or unconvincing.
-Then being able to explain why you find the evidence convincing or unconvincing.
Bloom’s (1956) Hierarchy/Taxonomy of Thinking Skills
Evaluate ;(Make judgments about the value of ideas or information)
Synthesize ;(Combine
ideas or information into something new)
Analyse; (Make a systematic and detailed examination
of an Argument or piece of research)
Apply:(Use knowledge)
Comprehend ;(Have understanding)
Know; (Be aware of something, recall information)
Apply:(Use knowledge)
Comprehend ;(Have understanding)
Know; (Be aware of something, recall information)
Differences between descriptive and critical analytical
writing
Descriptive writing
|
Critical analytic writing
|
States what happened
|
Identifies its significance
|
States what something is like
|
Evaluates strengths and weaknesses
|
Lists details
|
Evaluates relative significance of details
|
States the order in which things happened
|
Makes reasoned judgments
|
Says how to do something
|
Argues a case according to the evidence
|
Practicing
critical analysis
It helps if
you ask yourself a series of questions about the material you are reading:
-Who is the author and what is their viewpoint
or bias?
-Who is the audience and how does that influence the way information is presented?
-What is the main message of the text?
-What evidence has been used to support this main message?
-Is the evidence convincing; are there any counter-arguments?
-Do I agree with the text and why do I agree or disagree?
-Who is the audience and how does that influence the way information is presented?
-What is the main message of the text?
-What evidence has been used to support this main message?
-Is the evidence convincing; are there any counter-arguments?
-Do I agree with the text and why do I agree or disagree?
How to
get more critical analysis into your essay
-Avoid
unnecessary description – only include general background details and history
-Practice distinguishing between description (telling what happened) and analysis (judging why something happened)
-Practice distinguishing between description (telling what happened) and analysis (judging why something happened)
Interpret
your evidence – explain how and why your evidence supports your point.
Interpretation is an important part of critical analysis, and you should not
just rely on the evidence "speaking for itself”
Be
specific - avoid making sweeping generalisations or points that are difficult
to support without specific evidence. It is better to be more measured and tie
your argument to precise examples or case studies
Use
counter-arguments to your advantage – if you find viewpoints that go against
your own argument, don't ignore them. It strengthens an argument to include an
opposing viewpoint and explain why it is not as convincing as your own line of
reasoning.””
Writing critically
-How do I criticise the work of
established academics/practitioners?
-By reading other established
academics/ practitioners that may have different views
-By looking for practical evidence that may support or refute the established theory.
-By looking for practical evidence that may support or refute the established theory.
-How can I criticise other’s
work?
-Check for logical coherency of
the arguments.
-May the author be biased?
-May the author be biased?
-Cultural, gender, professional
biases, etc.
-Does the author clearly outline
his/her theoretical base?
-Are the author’s arguments supported by relevant evidence and other people’s work?
-Are the author’s methods trustworthy?
-Are the author’s arguments supported by relevant evidence and other people’s work?
-Are the author’s methods trustworthy?
-Is critical writing about
criticising other’s work?
-Yes but it is only a small part.
-It is also about:
-Integrating different sources of
information (books, articles, etc.) to provide a fuller picture of your topic.
-Giving an overview of your topic:
-Giving an overview of your topic:
-What are the key themes,
arguments and conclusions?
-How were they developed?
-Do the authors in the area agree/disagree with each other?
-What does the theory in your topic mean for practice?
-How were they developed?
-Do the authors in the area agree/disagree with each other?
-What does the theory in your topic mean for practice?
-Providing practical evidence to
illustrate and support your arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment